Declaration of the World Court of Jerusalem’s Own Necessity, Goals, and Authority

Draft Advisory Ruling Declaring the Court’s Own Necessity, Goals, and Authority

The United Nations, International Court of Justice (ICJ), International Criminal Court (ICC), and other current systems and frameworks have failed to correctly address and solve dangerous global problems. Many of the world’s problems are solvable, but unsolvable within the current systems and its rules, norms, practices, even with the best diplomacy. On this current path of increasing difficulty and danger, such problems will continue to escalate until humanity finds itself again far from peace.

The World Court of Jerusalem’s own Necessity, Goals, and Authority

In some matters, the United Nations, and other current systems and frameworks are unwilling or unable to answer the pending and increasingly critical moral questions of our time, that left unanswered, are leading and will lead the world to increasing polarization and war.

In some matters, the United Nations, and other current systems and frameworks are unable or unwilling to differentiate between factual truth and falsehood, and even acknowledge historic fact necessary for the foundation for constructive progress toward resolution of conflicts.

Often, the United Nations and other current systems and frameworks are:

unable to correctly identify parties to disputes
unable to correctly define applicable terms like racist, colonizer, apartheid, terrorist, indigenous, aggressor
unable to correctly define fundamental understandings necessary for resolving increasingly serious disputes
unable to correctly address, and in fact often enhance, weaknesses of the nation-state system, rendering unable to help ethnic minorities, cultures, tribes, and religious groups

The United Nations’ failures and misconduct, veto paralysis, corruption and mismanagement include:

failures with 1995 Oil-For-Food Program
failed to act to stop genocide like the 1994 Rwanda Genocide
failed to deal with non-state actors
failed to resolve the Syrian Civil War
failed to resolve the Russia-Ukraine Conflict
failed to resolve the Kashmir dispute
failed to resolve the Cyprus conflict
failed to resolve the Western Sahara conflict
failed to resolve Yemen’s civil war
failed to resolve South Sudan ethnic conflicts
failed to resolve the Rohingya Crisis in Myanmar
failed to resolve the Kurdish conflicts
failed to resolve the Boko Haram Insurgency in Nigeria
failed to resolve the Taliban in Afghanistan
failed to resolve Al-Shabaab in Somalia
failed to resolve conflicts in the Democratic Republic of Congo,
selectively enforced human rights and disproportionately targeted Israel.

In some matters, the United Nations, and other current systems and frameworks are even a legal and moral impediment to resolution, by encouraging parties whose positions otherwise have less moral credibility, and or platforming authoritative regimes. Many of its institutions and bodies are corrupted by the worst offenders of the institution’s agenda.

As such, arms races, nuclear proliferation, and unanswered ideological, religious, cultural, and territorial conflicts continue to escalate.

In order to bring about and preserve peace in present and imminent future conflicts around the world, for the peace and preservation of all mankind, the World Court of Jerusalem hereby determines that there is a need for a new system today, and that it is the duty of every person on earth to seek peace. As such, the Court hereby endeavors to establish itself as a moral light and authority to guide the world towards a better peace.